Steer focus: Seam Discovery & Enforcement

Identify and reinforce seam boundaries in scenario flows to reduce side effects.

54|7|Updated Sep 19, 2021
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Vrooli/Vrooli --skill steer-focus-seam-discovery-enforcement
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: Steer focus: Seam Discovery & Enforcement
Source: https://github.com/Vrooli/Vrooli/tree/main/scenarios/prompt-manager/store/skills/packs/core/seam-discovery-and-enforcement
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Vrooli/Vrooli --skill steer-focus-seam-discovery-enforcement

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

The scenario embeds integrations, I/O, and environment-specific behavior deep inside core logic, making it risky to change and difficult to test reliably. This Skill sharpens the architecture by highlighting where behavior varies so teams can assert boundaries and avoid accidental regressions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Seam Inventory: Review workflows, PRDs, requirements, and tests to surface existing variation points and document how they should behave.
  • Boundary Hardening: Identify where side effects leak into core behavior and group those operations behind focused adapters or interfaces.
  • Testing Enablement: Strengthen seams so tests can substitute dependencies, control integrations, and exercise core logic without triggering expensive I/O.
  • Knowledge Sharing: Read the scenario’s seams doc via knowledge-observatory-tools and update it with findings about strong and weak boundaries.

Quick Start

Invoke the seam-focused analysis to catalog variation points, reinforce boundaries, and refresh the shared seams documentation.

Frequently Asked Questions about Steer focus: Seam Discovery & Enforcement

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I identify seams in my architecture to make code more testable?

Seam discovery analyzes scenario flows to map variation points where external services and I/O intersect core logic. Documenting these boundaries allows teams to isolate side effects behind adapters, ensuring tests can exercise core logic without triggering expensive integrations.

Why does my integration testing trigger side effects across core logic?

Side effects leak into core logic when seam boundaries are weak, allowing environment-dependent behavior and I/O operations to entangle with core processes. Hardening these boundaries isolates integrations behind adapters, preventing accidental regressions during scenario execution.

How do I isolate external services and I/O for reliable integration testing?

Isolate external services by reinforcing seam boundaries and grouping I/O operations behind focused adapters. This boundary hardening allows tests to substitute dependencies and control integrations, exercising core logic without triggering expensive environment-dependent side effects.

Can I use seam analysis for prompt-manager flows that involve external services?

Yes, seam analysis specifically scopes architecture-focused scenario flows involving prompt-managers, external services, and I/O. It reinforces boundaries within these environments, ensuring tests can exercise variation points without triggering heavy side effects or environment-dependent failures.

What is the best way to document discovered seams and boundary variations?

Document discovered seams by updating a shared seams doc via knowledge-observatory-tools. This knowledge sharing approach records how variation points should behave, cataloging strong and weak boundaries to inform architecture decisions and prevent accidental regressions.

When should I not use seam discovery for modularity and testing?

Avoid seam discovery when scenario flows lack external services, I/O, or environment-dependent behavior. If core logic operates independently without integration points, reinforcing boundaries yields minimal testing enablement and modularity improvements for your architecture.