steer-prs

Analyze trunk deltas into PR-sized units banded by witness status.

30|12|Updated Jun 21, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/anthony-chaudhary/fak --skill steer-prs
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: steer-prs
Source: https://github.com/anthony-chaudhary/fak/tree/main/.claude/skills/steer-prs
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/anthony-chaudhary/fak --skill steer-prs

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill solves the problem of information overload on shared development trunks where high-frequency commits make it impossible for humans to manually track progress or identify where intervention is actually required.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Worst-Attention-First Prioritization: Automatically bands commits into RESIDUAL, UNVERIFIABLE, and CLEARED categories to ensure human attention is focused only on unwitnessed claims.
  • Regime Gate Enforcement: Prevents over-steering by providing a clear protocol for when to remain hands-off, protecting healthy development trajectories from unnecessary human interference.
  • Use Case: Use this skill during a daily code review loop to identify which forming PR-sized units on the trunk require a human look versus those that have been successfully diff-witnessed by the kernel.

Quick Start

Run the steer-prs skill to analyze the current trunk and identify which units require attention based on the worst-first priority band.

Frequently Asked Questions about steer-prs

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I manage code review overload with high-frequency trunk-based development?

Manage trunk-based development overload by folding commits into PR-sized units and banding them by witness status to prioritize unwitnessed claims for human review.

What is the best way to identify which pull requests need human attention on a shared trunk?

Identify pull requests needing attention by banding commits into RESIDUAL, UNVERIFIABLE, and CLEARED categories, focusing human review strictly on unwitnessed claims.

How do I prevent unnecessary human interference during workflow automation on a development trunk?

Prevent unnecessary human interference by enforcing regime-gate discipline, which provides a clear protocol for when to remain hands-off and protects healthy development trajectories.

Does steer-prs require any specific kernel integration to analyze pending trunk deltas?

Yes, analyzing pending trunk deltas requires integration with the fak kernel witness oracle to map commit claims against diff-witnessed outcomes.

How do I track pending development-to-release trunk deltas for daily code review loops?

Track pending development-to-release trunk deltas by folding high-frequency commits into PR-sized units and analyzing their witness status to guide daily review loops.