What problem does it solve? Choosing the wrong intervention site in mechanistic interpretability experiments produces misleading results: too few sites get denoised downstream and falsely show no effect, while too many cause off-distribution collapse that invalidates localization claims. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Site Screening Methods: Rank layers by gradient/attribution scores or activation signals (probe accuracy, diff-mean magnitude, separability) before intervening. - Heuristic Guidance: Start at mid-to-late layers, widen to 3-5 layers if one is inert, and sweep the stack at spaced intervals rather than every layer. - Component Targeting: Choose between attention, MLP, or residual stream based on the claim; circuit discovery studies attention heads plus MLP. - Use Case: When a plan hard-codes target_block: 4 copied from another paper, this Skill flags it and guides re-selection by relative depth scaling and screening, preventing false negative steering results. ## Quick Start Review my experiment plan that sets target_block to 4 and tell me which layers and components I should actually intervene on.