stigmergy-validation

Analyze complex inquiries to surface assumptions and map reasoning.

Updated Apr 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ravenoak/oh-my-stigmergy --skill stigmergy-validation
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: stigmergy-validation
Source: https://github.com/ravenoak/oh-my-stigmergy/tree/main/.cursor/skills/stigmergy-validation
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ravenoak/oh-my-stigmergy --skill stigmergy-validation

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps analysts systematically analyze and validate complex inquiries by surfacing assumptions, framing issues, and mapping the lines of reasoning to prevent premature conclusions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Interrogates questions to surface framing and hidden assumptions.
  • Maps the logical space, identifies contradictions and second-order effects, and tracks potential risks.
  • Follows an Allium-based workflow with a structured before-answer checklist, elenchus, and evidence-audit to ensure traceability.

Quick Start

Begin by listing the core question and the assumptions, then run through the before-answer checklist to surface frames and evidence.

Frequently Asked Questions about stigmergy-validation

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I validate assumptions in a complex systems-thinking analysis?

Validating assumptions requires interrogating the core question to surface hidden framing and mapping the logical space. Applying an Allium-based workflow with a before-answer checklist ensures traceability and prevents premature conclusions during complex analysis.

What is the best way to surface framing issues before answering a complex inquiry?

Surfacing framing issues involves systematically interrogating the inquiry to identify hidden assumptions. A structured elenchus approach maps contradictions and second-order effects, ensuring evidence gathering is disciplined and traceable before providing an answer.

How do I audit evidence and trace reasoning in complex analytical questions?

Auditing evidence involves mapping the logical space and tracking potential risks through a structured before-answer checklist. This process conforms to an Allium-based workflow that applies elenchus to ensure every line of reasoning maintains strict traceability.

When do I need a structured checklist to analyze complexity and prevent premature conclusions?

A structured checklist is needed when analyzing complex inquiries that require reasoning and evidence gathering. It helps surface assumptions, identify contradictions, and map second-order effects, ensuring disciplined analysis that prevents premature conclusions.

Can I use systems-thinking framing to identify second-order effects and risks?

Systems-thinking framing is applicable for identifying second-order effects and tracking potential risks. By interrogating the question to surface assumptions and mapping the logical space, the analysis ensures all contradictions and downstream impacts are systematically documented.