stop-ai-slop-jp

Rewrites AI-generated Japanese text into natural human-sounding prose with scored review reports.

1|Updated Aug 24, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/mjun0812/skills --skill stop-ai-slop-jp-mjun0812
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: stop-ai-slop-jp
Source: https://github.com/mjun0812/skills/tree/main/skills/writing/stop-ai-slop-jp
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mjun0812/skills --skill stop-ai-slop-jp-mjun0812

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? AI-generated Japanese writing often sounds unnatural due to missing authorial voice, formulaic structures, overused vocabulary, and mechanical rhythm. This Skill reviews such text and rewrites it into natural, readable Japanese that reads as if written by a human. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Multi-level review: Checks text from vocabulary and symbols up through sentences, paragraphs, chapter structure, and authorial stance, citing the original text for every issue found. - Scored report: Rates six axes (stance, agency, concreteness, rhythm, conciseness, readability) from 0-10 and classifies fixes as critical or recommended based on whether they block reader comprehension. - Selective revision: Applies only the numbered fixes the user chooses, and never invents facts, names, or episodes when rewriting. - Use Case: Paste an AI-drafted blog post or technical article and ask to remove the AI smell; receive a scored diagnostic report with quoted problem passages and concrete rewrite proposals. ## Quick Start Review this AI-written Japanese article and rewrite it so it reads like a human wrote it, then show me the scored report.

Frequently Asked Questions about stop-ai-slop-jp

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I make AI-written Japanese text sound more human?

Submit the text for review against checks covering authorial stance, structure, sentence rhythm, and vocabulary. The review produces a scored report with quoted problem passages and rewrite proposals, and you pick which numbered fixes to apply.

What kinds of AI writing patterns does this detect in Japanese?

It detects missing agency and vague subjects, fabricated drama like binary contrasts, imported English blog structures, uniform paragraph rhythm, hedging and conclusion avoidance, plus overused vocabulary such as favorite abstract words and untranslated katakana metaphors.

Does the rewriting add new facts or examples to my text?

No. When a fix would require new facts such as actors, numbers, or episodes, the proposal is phrased as a question to the author marked for confirmation rather than filled in by guesswork.

Can I use this as a style guide for writing new Japanese articles?

No. It is a proofreading skill for existing AI-written drafts and explicitly holds no writing norms for new composition. It reviews and rewrites submitted text rather than guiding fresh writing.

When is a fix marked critical versus recommended?

The criterion is whether the issue blocks reader comprehension. Critical issues include stance and structure problems, excessive negation, and unreadable references; recommended issues are vocabulary-level smells that readers can skip past.