Verified:GitHub

strategic-critique

Critique draft Đề án documents for logic, alignment, feasibility, and legal references.

Updated Aug 27, 2026

Search Tags:#feasibility #quality-assurance #dedup #document-review #adversarial-review #policy-alignment #legal-references

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/cuongnm-dev/team-ai-config --skill strategic-critique

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: strategic-critique
Source: https://github.com/cuongnm-dev/team-ai-config/tree/main/cursor/skills/strategic-critique
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/cuongnm-dev/team-ai-config --skill strategic-critique

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill helps researchers validate a Đề án before submission by role-playing an adversarial reviewer who uncovers gaps, vagueness, misalignments, and missing data that commonly trip reviews.

Core Features & Use Cases

Role-play adversarial reviewer to challenge draft Đề án and surface high-impact issues.
Performs cross-section checks (formal, substantive, coherence, alignment, dedup, feasibility, legal) and outputs structured guidance.
Suitable for pre-submission quality gates, compliance checks, and leadership briefings to improve success rates.

Quick Start

Submit the draft Đề án to the skill and request a full adversarial critique to generate actionable findings.

Frequently Asked Questions about strategic-critique

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I perform an adversarial review on a draft policy proposal?▼

An adversarial review for a draft policy proposal involves role-playing a rigorous reviewer to surface high-impact issues. It analyzes cross-section logic, alignment with CT 34 principles, dedup with national platforms, feasibility, and legal references to output actionable findings with remediation steps.

What is the best way to check feasibility and policy alignment before submission?▼

Checking feasibility and policy alignment requires an adversarial critique of the draft proposal. This process validates cross-section coherence, verifies alignment with CT 34 principles, and identifies missing data or vagueness to improve submission success rates.

How do I identify deduplication issues with national platforms in my document?▼

To identify deduplication issues with national platforms, conduct a cross-section check on the draft document. This adversarial review analyzes overlaps with existing national platforms to ensure your proposal's distinctiveness before submission.

Can I validate legal references and cross-section logic in a draft proposal?▼

Yes, you can validate legal references and cross-section logic by submitting the draft proposal for a full adversarial critique. The review performs formal, substantive, and coherence checks to surface misalignments and gaps in legal citations.

Does this pre-submission quality gate suit compliance checks for leadership briefings?▼

Yes, this adversarial review suits pre-submission quality gates and compliance checks for leadership briefings. It surfaces high-impact issues, vagueness, and missing data, outputting structured guidance with clear priorities to improve success rates.

What are the limitations of using an adversarial reviewer for document review?▼

An adversarial reviewer for document review focuses strictly on surfacing quality issues, cross-section logic, and policy alignment. It does not rewrite the draft; it outputs actionable findings with clear priorities and remediation steps for manual revision.