Strategic Planning with 3D Decision Matrix

Classify decisions into Trapdoor, High-Stakes, or Low-Stakes categories using SPADE and Six Thinking Hats.

Updated Jun 7, 2024
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ashishgurprit/ANLP_A3 --skill strategic-planning-with-3d-decision-matrix
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: Strategic Planning with 3D Decision Matrix
Source: https://github.com/ashishgurprit/ANLP_A3/tree/main/.claude.backup/skills/strategic-plan
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ashishgurprit/ANLP_A3 --skill strategic-planning-with-3d-decision-matrix

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires classify_decision.py, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a structured framework to systematically analyze and make high-stakes decisions, ensuring alignment with strategic objectives and mitigating risks.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Decision Classification: Automatically or manually classify decisions by reversibility and importance (Trapdoor, High-Stakes, Low-Stakes).
  • C-Suite Perspectives: Integrates viewpoints from CEO, CTO, CPO, CFO, COO, and CRO.
  • Six Thinking Hats: Applies structured thinking modes (White, Red, Black, Yellow, Green, Blue) for comprehensive analysis.
  • SPADE Framework: Guides through Setting, People, Alternatives, Decide, and Explain steps for robust decision-making.
  • Use Case: When deciding on a new architectural approach for a critical system, use this Skill to ensure all technical, user, and business implications are considered before committing.

Quick Start

Use the strategic-plan skill to classify the decision "Should we adopt a new microservices architecture for our core product?".

Frequently Asked Questions about Strategic Planning with 3D Decision Matrix

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I use a decision making framework for high-stakes technical architecture choices?

To use a decision making framework for high-stakes technical choices, this Skill classifies decisions by reversibility and applies the SPADE framework to systematically analyze alternatives, risks, and benefits before committing.

What is the SPADE framework and how does it integrate with Six Thinking Hats?

The SPADE framework guides decisions through Setting, People, Alternatives, Decide, and Explain steps, while integrating Six Thinking Hats to apply structured thinking modes like White, Black, and Yellow for comprehensive strategic analysis.

How do I classify strategic decisions by reversibility and importance?

You classify strategic decisions by reversibility and importance into Trapdoor, High-Stakes, or Low-Stakes categories, which determines the appropriate deliberation depth needed before proceeding with analysis.

Can I apply C-Suite perspectives to my product management risk assessment process?

Yes, you can apply C-Suite perspectives to your risk assessment process by integrating viewpoints from CEO, CTO, CPO, CFO, COO, and CRO to ensure technical, user, and business implications are fully considered.

When should I not use a comprehensive strategic planning framework for decision making?

You should not use comprehensive strategic planning for Low-Stakes decisions, as classifying decisions by reversibility determines deliberation depth, meaning highly reversible choices require less systematic analysis than Trapdoor or High-Stakes categories.