Stress-test a thesis by identifying assumptions and surfacing counterarguments.
npx skills add https://github.com/jbrukh/skills --skill stress-test
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: stress-test Source: https://github.com/jbrukh/skills/tree/main/skills/stress-test Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jbrukh/skills --skill stress-test
Adversarially tests a thesis to identify load-bearing assumptions, differentiate it from consensus, and surface conditions that would change the mind.
Provide the thesis you want stress-tested and request the strongest counterarguments to probe its robustness.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Stress-testing a thesis involves adversarially probing its logic to identify load-bearing assumptions, differentiate it from consensus, and surface conditions that would change your mind, revealing hidden blind spots before publication.
Evaluating counterarguments against your thesis is done by enforcing precise engagement, where each attack quotes the exact thesis to ensure relevance, then guides a three-phase process to extract insights, challenge framing, and surface actionable revisions.
Yes, you can use this critical evaluation process for any theoretical argument. It applies to readers validating new takes, evaluating differentiation from consensus, and surfacing actionable revisions across diverse research contexts.
Evidence analysis works by running a structured three-phase adversarial process that extracts insights, challenges framing, and provides 3-5 concrete vulnerabilities plus a kill question to reveal missing evidence and blind spots.
A limitation of this adversarial approach is that it focuses purely on identifying weaknesses and missing evidence, meaning you must separately synthesize the surfaced vulnerabilities and actionable revisions into your final published work.
Davie521Generate personalized investor outreach drafts with subject, pitch, ask, and sign-off.
abzhawAnalyze thesis sections for logical coherence and argument strength.
patricksavalleClassify empirical claims by evidence strength and methodological rigor.
alexsandrocruzVerify code review feedback against the codebase before implementing changes.
