strong-edit

Critique a document's core argument across staged review levels.

1|Updated Feb 8, 2026

Search Tags:#workflow #editing #readability #structure #critique #argument-analysis #stage-based

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/nakane1chome/claude-skills --skill strong-edit

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: strong-edit
Source: https://github.com/nakane1chome/claude-skills/tree/main/skills/strong-edit
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/nakane1chome/claude-skills --skill strong-edit

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill facilitates rigorous, stage-based critique of articles to identify and address weaknesses in structure, argument strength, relevance, and readability, rather than simply polishing prose.

Core Features & Use Cases

Stage-based critique workflow with stops after each stage for developer review.
Stage 0-4 provide critique; Stage 5 applies editor-driven revisions approved by the developer.
Provides structured evaluation of argument, organization, and clarity to improve the piece's impact.

Quick Start

Upload a document and begin with Stage 0 to identify the core argument.

Frequently Asked Questions about strong-edit

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I critique and strengthen the core argument of a draft document?▼

A stage-based critique workflow evaluates document drafts for structure, relevance, and readability to improve argument clarity and rigor. It identifies weaknesses through staged reviews rather than simply polishing prose.

What is the best way to systematically review article structure without changing the author's intent?▼

A stage-based editing workflow preserves author intent by separating critique from revisions. It evaluates article structure in stages and applies edits only during a final stage after explicit developer approval at each review stop.

Can I get feedback on my document's readability before committing to any text changes?▼

Yes, you can receive readability feedback before changes occur. The workflow provides critique across early stages without applying edits, pausing for developer review after each stage to ensure changes align with author intent.

How do I start a stage-based editing workflow for argument analysis?▼

To start an argument analysis workflow, upload your document and begin with Stage 0 to identify the core argument. The workflow then progresses through structured stages, stopping for developer review after each critique phase.

When should I avoid using a stage-based critique workflow for editing?▼

You should avoid a stage-based critique workflow if you only need simple prose polishing. This process is designed for rigorously evaluating argument strength, structure, and readability, requiring explicit stage ownership and multiple review stops.