structure-visual-inspection

Render four-view panels of atomic structures and inspect adsorption geometries for issues.

13|1|Updated Nov 27, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/q734738781/CatMaster --skill structure-visual-inspection
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: structure-visual-inspection
Source: https://github.com/q734738781/CatMaster/tree/main/skills/structure-visual-inspection
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/q734738781/CatMaster --skill structure-visual-inspection

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Provides quick, interpretable visual evidence to catch geometry issues, adsorption-site ambiguities, and obvious clashes that may be missed by numerical summaries alone, helping users decide when to trust visuals versus running deeper numeric checks.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Four-view rendering: Produce a standardized panel of views to enable consistent visual comparison across candidates.
  • Image-assisted checks: Use narrow, question-driven image analysis for orientation sanity, obvious clashes, or pre/post-relaxation comparisons.
  • Context-aware rendering: Encourage controlled supercell adjustments (e.g., (2,2,1) or (3,3,1)) when slab-site context is too local.
  • Use Case: Rapidly screen adsorption geometries prior to ranking or inclusion in manuscript figures, and return image artifacts for reporting.

Quick Start

Render a default four-view panel of the structure and inspect it visually, invoking automated image analysis only if the visual evidence is ambiguous.

Frequently Asked Questions about structure-visual-inspection

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform a visual sanity check for atomic slab structures?

Perform a visual sanity check for atomic slab structures by generating standardized four-view rendering panels to identify obvious geometry issues and adsorption site ambiguities visually.

What is the best way to compare adsorption geometries before ranking candidates?

Compare adsorption geometries by rendering standardized four-view panels to catch obvious clashes or site ambiguities that numerical summaries miss, returning a conclusion state indicating obvious, tentative, or requiring numerical confirmation.

How do I render a supercell when slab-site context is too local?

Render a supercell by applying controlled adjustments like (2,2,1) or (3,3,1) to expand the slab-site context when the local view is too narrow for accurate visual inspection.

Can image analysis detect adsorption site ambiguities in computational catalysis workflows?

Yes, image analysis detects adsorption site ambiguities in computational catalysis workflows by applying narrow, question-driven checks for orientation sanity and obvious clashes when visual evidence is ambiguous.

When do I need numerical confirmation after a visual structure inspection?

You need numerical confirmation after a visual structure inspection when the returned conclusion state indicates tentative issues or explicitly requires numerical confirmation to verify ambiguous adsorption geometries.