Structured Code Review

Structured PR feedback categorizes findings into CRITICAL, SUGGESTION, QUESTION, and NIT severity levels for faster prioritization. You paste your PR description and changed files into the prompt to receive a review covering architecture, logic correctness, tests, and security risks.

Severity triage in code review organizes architectural, correctness, and security findings by impact level. It helps reviewers catch issues like XSS, SQLi, and auth bypass before production by providing a prioritized, actionable feedback list with recommended next steps.

Yes, this code review skill is applicable to PR reviews, code audits, and pre-submission checks for feature development or refactors across any codebase. It checks changes against the project’s domain glossary and ADRs while recommending idiomatic patterns.

To check test coverage and security risks during a code audit, you provide the changed files to review. The process audits edge cases, verifies appropriate test coverage, and calls out common security risks like XSS, SQLi, and auth bypass.

The best way to review architectural integrity is to evaluate changes for deeper, well-factored components and glossary consistency. This approach flags opportunities to turn shallow modules into deeper ones and enforces idiomatic patterns aligned with project ADRs.