study

Inspect primary material and separate fact from inference before acting.

2|Updated Jul 11, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/nmnmcc/skills --skill study-nmnmcc
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: study
Source: https://github.com/nmnmcc/skills/tree/main/skills/study
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/nmnmcc/skills --skill study-nmnmcc

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps you avoid shallow answers, premature decisions, and mistaken changes by requiring careful study of the real situation before any meaningful move.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Deep Understanding First: Learns the actual object, context, evidence, constraints, and risks before answering, planning, judging, designing, coding, or acting.
  • Evidence-Guided Thinking: Encourages inspection of primary material, direct observation, comparison of alternatives, and checking what is observed versus inferred.
  • Adaptive to Uncertainty: Scales from a brief check for simple reversible work to broader investigation for unfamiliar, contested, costly, or irreversible tasks.
  • Use Case: Before changing a system, the Skill helps you inspect the current behavior, identify unknowns, test assumptions, and choose the safest next step.

Quick Start

Use the study skill to inspect the real situation deeply before you answer, decide, or act.

Frequently Asked Questions about study

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I investigate evidence and constraints before making irreversible decisions?

To investigate evidence before making irreversible decisions, inspect primary materials directly, separate facts from inferences, and evaluate constraints. This evidence-based check reveals incorrect models and prevents premature actions.

What is the best way to study unfamiliar systems before changing code?

The best way to study unfamiliar systems before changing code is to inspect current behavior, identify unknowns, test assumptions, and compare alternatives. This ensures you choose the safest next step for system changes.

How does critical thinking help with contested claims and risk assessment?

Critical thinking helps with contested claims and risk assessment by requiring direct observation of primary evidence and separating facts from assumptions. This method scales investigation depth based on task uncertainty and stakes.

When do I need deep analysis versus a brief check for decision-making?

You need deep analysis for costly, unfamiliar, or irreversible decisions involving high risk, while a brief check suffices for simple, reversible work. The investigation scales adaptively based on the uncertainty of the task.

How to avoid shallow answers and premature decisions when planning complex tasks?

To avoid shallow answers and premature decisions when planning complex tasks, require careful study of the real situation, including history and failure modes. Understand the actual context deeply before answering or acting.