su-review

Automates review of CCB execution results via receipts, diffs, and evidence.

17|2|Updated Jun 2, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/SeemSeam/agent-roles-spec --skill su-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: su-review
Source: https://github.com/SeemSeam/agent-roles-spec/tree/main/roles/su-ccb/skills/su-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/SeemSeam/agent-roles-spec --skill su-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the review of execution receipts, diffs, and evidence to make informed decisions on task outcomes, reducing manual review time and improving accuracy.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated Review: Evaluate execution results against specifications for pass/fail determination.
  • Task Analysis: Provide detailed feedback on tasks, including requirement analysis, technical design, task breakdown, and implementation.
  • Use Case: For a developer working on a complex task, use this Skill to automatically review and validate the execution against the defined specifications.

Quick Start

Review the execution of task with ID 'task123' using the /ccb:su-review task_id=task123 command.

Frequently Asked Questions about su-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate execution validation for CCB task receipts and diffs?

Automating CCB execution validation requires analyzing execution receipts, diffs, and evidence to determine task pass or fail outcomes. This Skill evaluates execution results against defined specifications to provide detailed requirement and implementation feedback.

What is the best way to validate task execution outcomes against project specifications?

Validating task execution outcomes requires comparing execution receipts and diffs against the original project specifications. This Skill automates that comparison to make informed pass or fail decisions, delivering detailed feedback on technical design and implementation.

Does the CCB execution review process require specific input formats for task analysis?

The CCB execution review process requires robust input validation to ensure accurate task analysis. You must supply the execution receipts, diffs, and evidence for the specific task ID so the automated review can accurately determine the pass or fail outcome.

How do I review a specific task using the task ID in a project management workflow?

To review a specific task in a project management workflow, execute the review command with your designated task ID. The Skill then analyzes the associated execution receipts and diffs to validate the task outcome against specifications.

What limitations should I expect when analyzing execution evidence for pass or fail determination?

When analyzing execution evidence for pass or fail determination, the main limitation is the strict dependency on robust input validation and error handling. Inaccurate or incomplete execution receipts and diffs will compromise the accuracy of the automated review outcome.