subagent-driven-development

Automated implementation plans with code review checkpoints dispatch an isolated subagent per task, then run spec compliance and code quality reviews that loop until both pass. This prevents tangled tasks and skipped reviews during continuous plan execution.

Subagent-driven development handles task isolation by dispatching a fresh implementer subagent with isolated context per task, ensuring it does not inherit prior session history. This keeps independent tasks from interfering and maintains spec alignment throughout execution.

TDD workflow orchestration executes continuously across independent tasks without pauses by dispatching isolated subagents and running automated two-stage reviews. Execution stops only for real blockers, ambiguity, or when missing context requires user input.

Yes, subagent-driven development suits projects where tasks are mostly independent, require spec alignment, and benefit from isolated agent context within the same session. It dispatches a fresh subagent per task to maintain clean execution boundaries.

Implementation plans return NEEDS_CONTEXT or BLOCKED statuses when tasks encounter ambiguity, missing information, or real blockers. The workflow interprets these statuses to decide whether to revise instructions, ask for missing context, switch models, or refactor task granularity.

The best way to enforce spec compliance before code quality is a two-stage review flow: spec compliance review first, code quality review second, with fix-and-retry loops that iterate until both quality gates pass before moving to the next task.