subagent-pr-reviewer

Automate GitHub Pull Request reviews with parallel subagents for architecture, code quality, and requirements.

Updated Apr 22, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/aroido/vibesmith --skill subagent-pr-reviewer
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: subagent-pr-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/aroido/vibesmith/tree/main/.codex/skills/subagent-pr-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/aroido/vibesmith --skill subagent-pr-reviewer

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the process of reviewing GitHub Pull Requests, providing automated feedback and decision-making on whether a PR is ready for merging.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated Code Review: Leverages multiple specialized subagents (Architect, Code Reviewer, Requirements Checker) to perform a comprehensive review.
  • Automated Approval/Rejection: Makes a decision based on predefined criteria, including score thresholds and the presence of critical issues.
  • Use Case: Integrate this Skill into your CI/CD pipeline to automatically review all incoming Pull Requests, flagging critical issues and approving well-formed changes, thus speeding up the development workflow.

Quick Start

Use the subagent-pr-reviewer skill to automatically review pull request number 123.

Frequently Asked Questions about subagent-pr-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate GitHub pull request reviews in my CI/CD pipeline?

Automating GitHub pull request reviews involves configuring a CI/CD pipeline to trigger a skill that executes parallel subagents for architecture, code quality, and requirements checking. It determines approval based on predefined scoring and issue thresholds.

Can I automatically request changes for critical issues found in a pull request?

Automated pull request reviews can optionally request changes for critical issues detected during the process. The system evaluates predefined scoring and issue thresholds to determine if a PR should be rejected or flagged for mandatory modifications.

What is the best way to run parallel code quality and architecture checks on a PR?

Running parallel checks on a PR leverages multiple specialized subagents, including an Architect, Code Reviewer, and Requirements Checker. This parallel execution provides a comprehensive review of code quality and architecture before determining merge approval.

Does automated PR reviewing support triggering auto-fixes for major code issues?

Automated PR reviewing supports optionally triggering auto-fixing for major issues identified during the evaluation. This functionality runs alongside the standard code quality and requirements checking subagents to streamline the development workflow.

How does the automated approval mechanism work for GitHub pull requests?

The automated approval mechanism works by executing parallel subagents that evaluate architecture, code quality, and requirements. It makes a final approval or rejection decision based on predefined scoring thresholds and the presence of critical issues.