subagent-result-merge

Merging parallel review findings requires consolidating structured inputs from multiple agents, deduplicating overlapping issues, linking evidence, and ranking severity. This process transforms scattered team outputs into a prioritized, actionable report for streamlined project review.

Consolidating duplicate findings from multiple team reviews involves eliminating redundant entries while linking each issue back to its original evidence. This deduplication process ensures a clean, unified report that retains all critical contextual data.

Severity ranking during agent output combination works by prioritizing consolidated issues based on their severity and confidence levels. This ensures the most critical findings are addressed first in the final merged report.

Yes, you need structured input from each agent's review to combine outputs effectively in a multi-agent review workflow. Structured inputs enable accurate deduplication, evidence linking, and severity ranking to generate a cohesive actionable report.

You should use a review merge process for team collaboration when multiple team members work on a project and their parallel outputs need combining. It is designed to analyze and consolidate various sources into one unified report.