submission-auditor

Automated submission review converts a professor's brief into a confirmed Submission Spec, auditing each file against deterministic checks and generating feedback drafts with evidence-located findings traceable via an auditable ledger.

Batch auditing supports cross-genre submissions including lab reports, papers, theses, code projects, and presentations, processing multiple files simultaneously to produce per-student feedback reports alongside a class-level pattern report.

Specification-driven evaluation enforces a confirmed spec and deterministic checks, applying privacy-preserving pseudonymization and cross-submission fairness checks to ensure traceable, equitable outcomes across all audited files.

A Submission Spec is a confirmed compilation of a professor's standards, templates, and rubrics converted into deterministic checks and judgment criteria, enabling consistent automated evaluation across all student submissions.

Submission auditing operates independently without external dependencies, using internal agents, references, and templates to execute specification-driven reviews and generate feedback reports entirely within its own environment.

Compiling a professor's brief into checkable criteria involves converting templates, rubrics, and requirements into a confirmed Submission Spec, enabling standardized audits with evidence-located findings for every submission.