summarize-paper

Generate structured markdown peer reviews of academic papers from files, URLs, or arXiv IDs.

Updated Feb 6, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/wtgme/literature-review-skills --skill summarize-paper
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: summarize-paper
Source: https://github.com/wtgme/literature-review-skills/tree/main/.gemini/skills/summarize-paper
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/wtgme/literature-review-skills --skill summarize-paper

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires pymupdf, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the process of critically analyzing academic papers, providing a structured, peer-review-style evaluation that goes beyond simple summarization.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • In-depth Analysis: Generates a rigorous review covering contributions, methodology, relation to prior work, strengths, limitations, and future extensions.
  • Automated Saving: Saves the full review to Google Drive and updates a searchable index document.
  • Use Case: When you encounter a new research paper and need a detailed, critical assessment to understand its impact and validity, use this Skill.

Quick Start

Use the summarize-paper skill to critically review the paper located at '/path/to/paper.pdf'.

Frequently Asked Questions about summarize-paper

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I critically review an academic paper from an arXiv ID?

Yes, you can analyze and review a PDF document from a web URL. The tool fetches the academic paper, extracts its text using PyMuPDF, and evaluates its contributions, methodology, strengths, and limitations into a structured markdown review.

Can I automatically save literature reviews to Google Drive?

Yes, you can automatically save literature reviews to Google Drive. Upon completing the academic paper analysis, the tool saves the structured markdown review and updates a searchable central index document for future reference.

Does the review process evaluate methodology and code from GitHub repositories?

Yes, the review process evaluates methodology and optionally inspects associated GitHub repositories. It analyzes code-paper mapping to assess the validity of results, providing a comprehensive assessment of the research's technical implementation.

What is the best way to analyze limitations and future extensions of a research paper?

The best way to analyze limitations and future extensions of a research paper is using an automated critical review. The process extracts methodology and prior work to generate a rigorous evaluation of the study's constraints and potential future research directions.