sumo-qa-planning-qa-rollout

Convert amorphous QA objectives into dispatchable rollout plans with file and risk coverage.

5|1|Updated May 12, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/sumithr/sumo-qa --skill sumo-qa-planning-qa-rollout
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: sumo-qa-planning-qa-rollout
Source: https://github.com/sumithr/sumo-qa/tree/main/skills/sumo-qa-planning-qa-rollout
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/sumithr/sumo-qa --skill sumo-qa-planning-qa-rollout

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill converts an unclear QA request into a dispatchable, file-anchored rollout plan that a fresh subagent can execute without needing back-and-forth.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Scope-to-plan conversion: Breaks a QA story or PR/strategy phase into 3–10 independent chunks sized for short execution windows.
  • Repo-aware structuring: Walks the repository to identify real files touched, test framework/fixture conventions, and CI patterns so task placement matches existing practice.
  • Handoff-ready artifacts: Produces a single plan document in docs/qa/plans/ with bite-sized tasks, approach tags, risk anchors, and per-task deliverable definitions.

Quick Start

Ask for the QA rollout plan for a PR or feature, specifying that you want independently executable tasks ready for dispatch by sumo-qa-executing-qa-rollout.

Frequently Asked Questions about sumo-qa-planning-qa-rollout

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I turn a QA objective into an execution-ready rollout plan?

To turn a QA objective into a rollout plan, you convert the amorphous request into a written, dispatchable plan with bite-sized tasks and anchored file/risk coverage. This produces a single plan artifact ready for subagent execution before any test code is written.

What is the best way to break down a large QA story into independently executable tasks?

The best way to break down a large QA story is to split the work into 3 to 10 independent chunks sized for short execution windows. Each chunk receives explicit task approach tagging and per-task deliverable definitions for clear handoff.

How do you structure test execution plans to match existing repository conventions?

To structure test execution plans to match repository conventions, you walk the repository to identify real files touched, test framework fixture patterns, and CI configurations. This ensures task placement and risk coverage align with existing practice.

Does the QA planning process generate test code or only the planning artifact?

The QA planning process generates only the planning artifact, satisfying a planner-only requirement. It produces a markdown document at docs/qa/plans/ with stepwise confirmation gates and explicit task approach tagging without writing any test code.

When should I not use an automated QA planning approach for my PR?

You should not use automated QA planning when your PR or strategy phase work cannot be split into at least 3 independently executable chunks. It is designed specifically for scenarios requiring preparation before any test code is written.