superpowers-verification-before-completion

Enforce evidence-based verification before marking software tasks complete.

90|5|Updated Jun 13, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/christopherarter/superpowers-reasonix --skill superpowers-verification-before-completion-christopherarter
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: superpowers-verification-before-completion
Source: https://github.com/christopherarter/superpowers-reasonix/tree/main/skills/superpowers-verification-before-completion
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/christopherarter/superpowers-reasonix --skill superpowers-verification-before-completion-christopherarter

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Claiming completion without fresh verification evidence is dishonest and inefficient; this Skill enforces evidence-first completion to prevent premature or deceptive status updates.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Enforces a formal verification gate before marking work done, merged, or handed off to stakeholders.
  • Integrates a repeatable workflow for running tests, checks, and command outputs to generate trustworthy evidence.
  • Use Case: before closing a feature, run the verification steps and attach the results to the PR or task log.

Quick Start

Run the verification workflow before declaring completion and attach the fresh command outputs as evidence.

Frequently Asked Questions about superpowers-verification-before-completion

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I enforce evidence-based verification before marking a coding task complete?

Evidence-based verification enforces a formal gate requiring running tests and command outputs before marking work done. The workflow uses a stepwise procedure—identify, run, read, verify, and report—to generate fresh evidence for completion claims.

What is the best way to prevent premature completion claims during code review?

Preventing premature completion claims requires attaching fresh command outputs to the PR or task log. The verification workflow integrates into review and commit workflows, explicitly checking failure modes and evidence before final approval.

How does a formal verification gate integrate into software development workflows?

A formal verification gate integrates into software development workflows by applying a stepwise procedure during task finalization and code review. It requires running tests and checks, reading outputs, verifying results, and reporting evidence before closing a feature.

Can I use completion verification for feature closure and stakeholder handoffs?

Completion verification suits feature closure and stakeholder handoffs by enforcing repeatable test and check workflows. It generates trustworthy evidence through command outputs, ensuring work is not merged or handed off without fresh verification.

What are the failure modes when enforcing evidence-first task completion?

Evidence-first task completion identifies explicit failure modes when verification steps detect unverified claims. The workflow prevents deceptive status updates by requiring test execution and command output reading before reporting final results.