supervisor-review-queue

To route student drafts through professor approval, this Skill manages a formal supervision workflow by presenting pending items from a review queue and recording approve, edit, or return actions for compliance. It requires setting the clinic supervision style to formal review queue in CLAUDE.md to activate the gating mechanism.

A formal review queue for legal drafting supervision is an approval gate ensuring a professor reviews student work before release to clients or courts. It triages pending submissions by urgency and student breakdown, logging all governance evidence that a qualified professional reviewed the drafts.

You log approve, edit, or return actions by processing queued items from the review-queue.yaml file. The Skill records these actions as clinic governance evidence, requiring a revision note when returning drafts to students for iterative editing cycles.

No, you cannot use this approval workflow if your clinic supervision style is not set to formal review queue. The Skill stays dormant and informs the professor how to switch the supervision style in CLAUDE.md to enable the draft intake and triage queue functionality.

Yes, the student supervision queue tracks urgency and student breakdown for pending drafts. It displays pending items from the review-queue.yaml reference file so professors can quickly triage what needs attention across iterative approve, edited-approved, and returned queue states.

Yes, returned student drafts are required to include a note for revision. When a professor returns a draft through the formal review queue, the Skill mandates a revision note to guide the student before the item re-enters the pending queue states.