SweetClaude Retro

Project improvement registers are managed by parsing JSONL or Markdown entries and applying decay-weighted relevance to surface the most pertinent development learnings. This structured process prevents project drift by systematically reviewing and refining registered insights.

A structured retrospective is facilitated through an interactive review session that guides users one-by-one to confirm, retire, or update development patterns and preferences. This ensures continuous project health by evaluating decay-weighted insights.

Decay-weighted relevance evaluates project learnings by parsing JSONL or Markdown entries to reduce the priority of older, potentially stale patterns over time. This mechanism surfaces the most relevant insights for an interactive review session.

Markdown and JSONL formats are fully supported for maintaining improvement registers, as the system parses these entries to apply decay-weighted relevance. This allows flexible logging of development patterns and preferences.

Stale development patterns are archived and a project health summary is generated by creating a checkpoint during the interactive review session. This updates the project state to ensure consistency and continuous improvement.

A structured retro process should be used when project drift occurs and forgotten learnings need a repeatable process for review, refinement, and archiving. It is ideal for maintaining long-term project health and state consistency.