swift-api-design-guidelines-skill

Review Swift APIs for naming, argument labels, and documentation conventions.

Updated Apr 4, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/curtislmartin/daily-ascent-engineering --skill swift-api-design-guidelines-skill-curtislmartin
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: swift-api-design-guidelines-skill
Source: https://github.com/curtislmartin/daily-ascent-engineering/tree/main/skills_repo/swift-api-design-guidelines-skill
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/curtislmartin/daily-ascent-engineering --skill swift-api-design-guidelines-skill-curtislmartin

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Swift API design often suffers from ambiguous naming, confusing argument labels, and inconsistent documentation.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Review existing APIs for naming clarity, argument labeling, and documentation comments to align with Swift conventions.
  • Refactor ambiguous interfaces to improve readability and maintainability.
  • Guide the design of new APIs from use-site perspectives, balancing mutating versus nonmutating naming and grammar for fluent call sites.
  • Support code reviews, API design reviews, and roadmap planning to improve API fluency across projects.

Quick Start

Analyze a Swift API surface and identify naming, labeling, and documentation improvements.

Frequently Asked Questions about swift-api-design-guidelines-skill

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I design Swift APIs for clarity at the point of use?

Designing Swift APIs for clarity involves aligning naming, argument labels, and documentation comments with established Swift conventions. You analyze interfaces from a use-site perspective to ensure fluent, readable call sites.

What is the best way to refactor ambiguous Swift interfaces?

Refactoring ambiguous Swift interfaces requires reviewing naming clarity, argument labeling, and terminology. You improve readability by balancing mutating versus nonmutating naming and grammar to achieve fluent call sites.

How do I write Swift argument labels that make call sites fluent?

Writing fluent Swift argument labels requires evaluating methods from the use-site perspective. You maintain consistency in label usage and align with Swift conventions to ensure the API reads naturally when invoked.

Can I use this to review Swift documentation comments for API consistency?

Yes, you can review Swift documentation comments for API consistency. The process enforces per-declaration documentation requirements and checks terminology alignment to maintain clarity across small libraries and large frameworks.

When do I need to align mutating versus nonmutating naming in Swift?

You need to align mutating versus nonmutating naming in Swift whenever you refactor or create interfaces. Maintaining consistent naming conventions ensures API behavior is clear and predictable at the point of use.

Does this approach support API design reviews for large Swift frameworks?

Yes, this approach supports API design reviews for large Swift frameworks. It guides the design of new APIs and the refactoring of existing ones to improve fluency and maintainability across entire project roadmaps.