swift-concurrency-pro

Analyze Swift source code for concurrency correctness and strict-concurrency safety.

Updated Jun 2, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/PicoMLX/SwiftSQLite --skill swift-concurrency-pro-picomlx
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: swift-concurrency-pro
Source: https://github.com/PicoMLX/SwiftSQLite/tree/main/.agents/skills/swift-concurrency-pro
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/PicoMLX/SwiftSQLite --skill swift-concurrency-pro-picomlx

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill addresses the complexity of modern Swift concurrency by identifying subtle bugs like actor reentrancy, data races, and improper task management that are difficult to catch during manual code reviews.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Concurrency Audit: Scans Swift code for dangerous patterns, incorrect actor isolation, and misuse of unstructured tasks.
  • Best Practice Enforcement: Ensures adherence to Swift 6.2+ standards, including structured concurrency and proper cancellation handling.
  • Use Case: When refactoring a legacy codebase to use async/await, use this Skill to verify that your new actor-based architecture is free from reentrancy-related state corruption.

Quick Start

Use the swift-concurrency-pro skill to review the concurrency patterns in the current project directory.

Frequently Asked Questions about swift-concurrency-pro

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I check my Swift code for actor reentrancy and data race issues?

To check Swift code for actor reentrancy and data races, analyze the source against strict-concurrency safety standards to identify dangerous patterns and incorrect actor isolation during code reviews.

What are common failure modes when migrating to Swift 6 structured concurrency?

Common Swift 6 structured concurrency failure modes include improper task management, unstructured task misuse, and actor reentrancy risks that cause state corruption during manual code reviews.

How do I validate async/await and task group implementation in Swift?

Validate async/await and task group implementation by auditing Swift source code for concurrency correctness and adherence to Swift 6.2+ best practices for proper cancellation handling.

Can I use this to refactor a legacy codebase to async streams and actors?

You can refactor legacy codebases to async streams and actors by scanning the project directory to verify the new architecture is free from reentrancy-related state corruption and data races.

Does this concurrency audit work with async streams and Swift 6.2+ APIs?

This concurrency audit works with async streams and Swift 6.2+ APIs by validating code against established failure modes and strict-concurrency safety standards for modern API usage.

Why does my actor-based architecture still experience state corruption?

Actor-based architecture experiences state corruption when subtle reentrancy bugs bypass isolation boundaries. Scanning for dangerous patterns and incorrect task management identifies these hard-to-catch concurrency issues.