synthesis-content-quality

Score AI-assisted content quality using a 36-point criteria framework.

15|2|Updated Mar 17, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/rajivpant/synthesis-skills --skill synthesis-content-quality
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: synthesis-content-quality
Source: https://github.com/rajivpant/synthesis-skills/tree/main/synthesis-content-quality
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/rajivpant/synthesis-skills --skill synthesis-content-quality

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Provides a repeatable, confidence-tiered methodology to detect, score, and remediate quality problems in AI-assisted writing so editors and creators can publish reliable, human-reviewed content.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 36-point evaluation: Comprehensive criteria across language, style, formatting, sourcing, confidentiality, and tone with high/medium/low confidence tags.
  • Detection & Triage: Highlights hallucinated citations, chatbot artifacts, placeholders, scenario fingerprinting, and concierge tone to prioritize editorial fixes.
  • Revision workflow: Stepwise guidance for eliminating formulaic patterns, verifying sources, adding expertise, and applying a Human Touch test; suitable for pre-publication review, training editors, and calibrating AI content generators.
  • Reference-backed guidance: Includes a detailed reference document explaining each criterion and remediation examples for consistent reviewer training.

Quick Start

Review this draft and produce a prioritized checklist of high, medium, and low confidence indicators from the 36-point framework with concrete revision actions.

Frequently Asked Questions about synthesis-content-quality

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I detect AI hallucinations and chatbot artifacts in generated content?

AI hallucination detection identifies fabricated citations, chatbot artifacts, and placeholder text by applying a 36-point criteria framework to flag high, medium, and low confidence issues for editorial review.

What is the best way to audit AI content quality before publication?

Auditing AI content quality involves evaluating text against a 36-point framework to score language, formatting, sourcing, and tone, producing a prioritized checklist with actionable revision guidance for human editors.

How do I check AI-assisted writing for confidentiality exposures and tone problems?

Checking AI-assisted writing for confidentiality exposures applies scenario fingerprinting and criteria-based evaluation to identify sensitive data leaks and concierge tone, generating stepwise remediation guidance.

Can I use a 36-point framework to train editors on AI content refinement?

You can train editors on AI content refinement using a reference-backed 36-point framework that details each evaluation criterion and provides remediation examples to ensure consistent reviewer calibration.

Does editorial review of AI content require any specific dependencies?

Editorial review of AI content using this 36-point evaluation framework requires no external dependencies, allowing reviewers to directly analyze text and produce confidence-tiered revision checklists.

Why does AI-generated writing still need a human touch test?

AI-generated writing needs a human touch test because automated outputs often contain formulaic patterns and hallucinated citations that require stepwise human verification and expertise integration to ensure reliable publication.