system-architecture-design

System architecture design uses decision trees to evaluate monolith, modular monolith, and microservice patterns based on your scalability and maintainability requirements. The chosen pattern is then documented to guide development governance.

The best way to document architecture decisions is using ADR templates, which capture the chosen architectural pattern and rationale. This ensures governance discussions and technology selections are recorded for mid-sized and large projects.

DDD concepts apply to layered architecture by defining clear domain boundaries and layering requirements, ensuring scalable systems remain maintainable. This approach helps structure complex business logic within your chosen architectural style.

You need high-availability and scalability considerations during design reviews for large or mid-sized projects. Identifying these requirements early ensures your chosen architecture pattern can handle expected loads and maintain uptime.

Yes, this process applies directly to technology selection and governance discussions for mid-sized projects. It identifies appropriate architectural styles and patterns, ensuring your technology choices align with layering and DDD requirements.

Choosing a modular monolith limits independent deployment compared to microservices, though it offers simpler operational overhead. The architecture design decision tree evaluates these trade-offs against your specific scalability and high-availability needs.