systematic-debug

Guide structured hypothesis testing with test bombs and layered tests.

32|3|Updated Feb 12, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/asynkron/asynkron-skills --skill systematic-debug
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: systematic-debug
Source: https://github.com/asynkron/asynkron-skills/tree/main/skills/systematic-debug
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/asynkron/asynkron-skills --skill systematic-debug

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Systematic debugging techniques help engineers identify hard-to-find root causes by guiding structured hypothesis testing with test bombs and layered tests.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Test bombs: generate one-test-per-hypothesis to quickly rule out suspects.
  • Layered tests: isolate pipeline stages to pinpoint where failures occur.
  • Cross-language templates: guidance for C#, TypeScript, Python, and Go workflows.

Quick Start

Describe your bug scenario in detail to generate a test bomb plan and a layered-test plan that isolates the failing stage.

Frequently Asked Questions about systematic-debug

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I debug a pipeline failure when I don't know why it's broken?

Systematic debugging isolates pipeline failures by guiding you to build layered tests with stage assertions. This method pinpoints the exact failing stage in multi-component workflows when the root cause is entirely unclear.

What is a test bomb for hypothesis-testing in debugging?

A test bomb is a targeted debugging technique that generates one specific test per hypothesis. It quickly rules out suspect variables in hard-to-reproduce bugs by validating each assumption individually across C#, TypeScript, Python, or Go.

How do I isolate a failure point in a multi-component pipeline?

You isolate failure points by creating layered tests that assert conditions at each pipeline stage. This structured approach systematically narrows down where the breakdown occurs across complex, cross-language workflows.

Does systematic debugging work for hard-to-reproduce bugs across different languages?

Yes, systematic debugging provides cross-language templates for C#, TypeScript, Python, and Go. It addresses hard-to-reproduce bugs by requiring clear hypotheses and per-hypothesis tests to validate suspect components.

When should I use structured hypothesis testing instead of standard debugging?

Use structured hypothesis testing when facing unclear root causes in multi-component pipelines. It replaces guesswork by enforcing per-layer stage assertions and one-test-per-hypothesis bombs to methodically isolate failures.