systematic-literature-review

Plan literature searches, deduplicate results, score papers, and draft LaTeX reports.

38|3|Updated May 7, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Chanw-research/claude-code-paper-writing --skill systematic-literature-review-chanw-research
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: systematic-literature-review
Source: https://github.com/Chanw-research/claude-code-paper-writing/tree/main/skills/literature-review/systematic-literature-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Chanw-research/claude-code-paper-writing --skill systematic-literature-review-chanw-research

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires pyyaml, requests, numpy, scikit-learn, matplotlib, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Systematic literature review work is time-consuming, error-prone, and hard to reproduce; this skill automates discovery, scoring, and writing workflows to improve rigor and speed.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • AI-driven search planning
  • Deduplication, scoring, and topic modeling
  • Automated drafting and validation
  • Use Case: Researchers producing a premium literature review in days instead of weeks

Quick Start

Use the systematic-literature-review skill to orchestrate a complete AI-assisted literature review workflow from topic to final draft.

Frequently Asked Questions about systematic-literature-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate a systematic literature review from multiple databases?

To automate a systematic literature review, use an AI-assisted workflow to plan multi-source searches, deduplicate results, score papers, and output ready-to-use LaTeX and BibTeX artifacts with provenance and validation checks.

What is AI-driven scoring in a literature review workflow?

AI-driven scoring applies unified algorithms to evaluate discovered papers, helping researchers select high-quality references and generate structured reports with reproducible word budgets and QA checks.

How do I deduplicate BibTeX entries when compiling references from multiple searches?

Deduplicating BibTeX entries requires a workflow that ingests multi-source search results, removes redundant records, and outputs clean BibTeX artifacts with provenance tracking and QA validation checks.

Does this literature review skill support exporting to LaTeX and BibTeX formats?

Yes, the literature review workflow outputs ready-to-use LaTeX and BibTeX artifacts, ensuring selected references and structured reports include provenance and QA validation checks for reproducible research.

Can I use OpenAlex for multi-source literature searches and topic modeling?

Yes, you can use OpenAlex to plan and execute multi-source literature searches, followed by deduplication, AI-driven scoring, and topic modeling to select high-quality references for a structured report.

What is the best way to ensure reproducibility in automated literature reviews?

The best way to ensure reproducibility in automated literature reviews is to use a unified AI-driven workflow with validation steps, provenance tracking, and reproducible word budgets when drafting the final structured report.