systematic-review

A systematic review workflow can be managed end-to-end by initializing a centralized project scaffold that tracks progress from your initial idea to a publication-ready manuscript. This approach enforces consistent folder structures, stage statuses, and guided prompts across all review phases.

PRISMA-compliant reporting ensures your systematic review meets international transparency standards. A guided workflow enforces this by applying consistent project scaffolding and tracking progress across each stage, ensuring your systematic review remains PRISMA-compliant from protocol to manuscript.

Yes, you can prepare PROSPERO and OSF registrations directly within the systematic review workflow. The orchestrator generates registration-ready protocols and maintains trackable progress from your research question through protocol development.

Evidence synthesis stages like screening and risk-of-bias are coordinated through a centralized systematic review orchestrator. It automatically routes your project to specialized skills for literature search, extraction, meta-analysis, and GRADE assessment while maintaining a unified folder structure.

The systematic review workflow coordinates specialized skills for PubMed queries, meta-analysis, and manuscript writing. You do not need to manually switch contexts; the orchestrator automatically delivers next-action guidance and triggers the appropriate specialized skill for each stage.