tabular-review

Convert contract batches into spreadsheet grids with verbatim evidence.

9|Updated May 18, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins --skill tabular-review-uk-agents
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: tabular-review
Source: https://github.com/uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins/tree/main/corporate-legal-uk/skills/tabular-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins --skill tabular-review-uk-agents

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill solves the problem of producing consistent, source-backed answers from many documents by converting repeated contract review questions into a single table everyone can verify quickly.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Spreadsheet-style batch review: one row per document and one column per data point, designed for diligence-style questions across large contract sets.
  • Typed, repeatable outputs: fixed column types (e.g., verbatim, classify, date, duration, currency) keep answers consistent and reduce “free-text drift.”
  • Verbatim evidence and audit trail: every answered cell includes a character-for-character quote plus a precise location, with explicit states for not_present, unclear, and needs_review to separate leads from findings.

Quick Start

Use tabular-review to extract change-of-control, assignment restrictions, termination notice, and governing law from a folder of target contracts into a CSV (with supporting source quotes for every cell).

Frequently Asked Questions about tabular-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I extract data from a batch of contracts into a spreadsheet for M&A diligence?

Batch contract review converts a folder of documents into a structured spreadsheet grid, applying standardized data points per row for M&A diligence. It outputs typed per-cell answers alongside verbatim quotes and precise source locations for verification.

Can I enforce consistent data types and handle missing values during bulk contract extraction?

Yes, bulk contract extraction enforces fixed column types like date, currency, and classify to prevent free-text drift. It explicitly separates findings from leads using not_present, unclear, and needs_review states for missing or ambiguous values.

What is the best way to verify extracted contract data points during vendor audit review?

The best way to verify extracted contract data points is using schema-driven extraction that includes an audit trail. Every answered cell contains a character-for-character verbatim quote and exact location, ensuring evidence-ready outputs for vendor audit review.

Does schema-driven tabular extraction support custom templates for lease portfolio review?

Yes, schema-driven tabular extraction supports custom templates and sample-based validation for repeatable workflows like lease portfolio review. You define the schema columns, and the tool populates the grid with typed answers and source quotes.

How to separate confirmed findings from ambiguous data in bulk contract review?

Bulk contract review separates confirmed findings from ambiguous data by enforcing explicit states. Cells are marked not_present, unclear, or needs_review, ensuring only verified answers with verbatim citations are treated as final findings.

What are the limitations of using spreadsheet-style batch processing for contract extraction?

Spreadsheet-style batch processing requires predefined schema templates to function effectively. Without structured column types and sample-based validation, the tool cannot enforce consistent typed outputs or verbatim citations across complex or unstructured document sets.