tacigent-stage-solution

Structure solution direction decisions by applying method framing to set anchors, generating at least four orthogonal candidates, and running a multi-critique evaluation cycle. This ensures a rigorous, auditable exploration of solution paths before committing to a design phase.

Orthogonal candidate generation creates multiple mutually exclusive solution directions to prevent anchoring bias. You need it when a problem requires comprehensive exploration and a structured, auditable evaluation of alternatives before narrowing down to a final design approach.

Evaluate solution candidates by applying a multi-critic swarm including First-Principles Pruner, Anchor-Drift, Feasibility, Differentiation, and Validation critiques. This governance process runs iterative critique cycles to filter and refine candidates against established anchors.

Yes, the process enforces a mandatory handoff to the design stage upon completion. It applies readiness gates and governance checks to ensure only a validated, auditable solution direction progresses safely to the subsequent design workflow.

The method framing approach requires generating at least four orthogonal candidates and completing full critique cycles, meaning it is not suited for rapid, ad-hoc decisions. It mandates a structured end-to-end workflow that may be excessive for simple problem-solving scenarios.