takedown

DMCA takedown notices must include specific §512(c)(3) statutory elements like good-faith belief and perjury statements. This skill drafts compliant notices by loading IP practice context and enforcing perjury gates before generating the final output.

When you receive a takedown notice, you can triage it to determine whether to comply, counter, engage, or ignore. This skill generates a triage memo assessing fair use under Lenz and routes decisions for attorney review when required.

A DMCA counter-notice under §512(g)(3) requires specific statutory elements and a perjury statement. This skill drafts compliant counter-notices by enforcing jurisdiction consent checks and perjury gates before producing the final document.

Yes, fair use must be considered before sending a takedown notice under the Lenz ruling. This skill enforces a fair-use consideration gate that blocks final takedown output until the assessment is complete.

DMCA takedowns are specific to US copyright law, but this skill enforces jurisdiction consent gates during drafting. It routes matters to attorney review when jurisdictional requirements exceed standard automated workflows.

Automated drafting cannot replace attorney review for complex fair use or jurisdictional issues. This skill enforces perjury gates and explicitly routes high-stakes decisions to legal counsel rather than generating final notices blindly.