tally

Evidence-grounded software development anchors code implementation to verifiable observation records and user-defined acceptance criteria. It prevents speculative coding by enforcing strict provenance, requiring automated subprocess output recording to cross-reference defined acceptance oracles.

To enforce contract-driven development for a CLI feature, initialize a workspace to define the requirement and machine-readable contract. The workflow automatically verifies implementation behavior by recording subprocess outputs and cross-referencing them against your defined acceptance criteria.

Contract-driven testing verifies implementation behavior by managing the lifecycle of requirements, observation records, and contract clauses. It automatically records subprocess outputs as verifiable evidence and cross-references them against your defined acceptance oracles to ensure strict compliance.

Yes, this workflow is designed specifically for single-feature development tasks. It manages the lifecycle of requirements and observation records, enforcing strict provenance by requiring automated recording of subprocess outputs to validate against acceptance oracles.

Yes, pyyaml is required. The workflow uses pyyaml to parse and manage the machine-readable contracts, requirement definitions, and observation records that anchor your single-feature development tasks to verifiable evidence.

The best way to create an audit trail for requirement verification is to use a workflow that enforces strict provenance. This requires automatically recording subprocess outputs as observation records and cross-referencing them with defined acceptance oracles.