taste-eval

Diagnose taste-level alignment and conflicts in creative work.

8|3|Updated Jan 1, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/jwynia/the-kepler-testimonies --skill taste-eval
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: taste-eval
Source: https://github.com/jwynia/the-kepler-testimonies/tree/main/.claude/skills/taste-eval
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jwynia/the-kepler-testimonies --skill taste-eval

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires https://deno.land/[email protected]/flags/mod.ts, and includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Taste-eval addresses the challenge of aligning creative output with explicit project preferences, surfacing where work diverges and enabling productive creative friction.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Taste alignment checks: Evaluate text against stated taste dimensions to surface alignment or conflict.
  • Conflict diagnosis and balancing: Identify where contributors' tastes clash and propose balancing options.
  • Voting and option curation: Generate diverse options that reflect different tastes for community voting.

Quick Start

Start by running a taste-eval pass on a draft to surface alignment with explicit project tastes.

Frequently Asked Questions about taste-eval

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I evaluate creative work against explicit project preferences?

Taste alignment checks evaluate text against stated taste dimensions to surface where drafts align with or diverge from explicit project preferences. The process diagnoses conflicts and provides actionable recommendations to balance creative work.

What is the best way to diagnose taste-level conflicts in collaborative storytelling?

Diagnosing taste-level conflicts in collaborative storytelling involves identifying where contributors' explicit preferences clash and proposing balancing options. This surfaces productive creative friction by exposing alignment or divergence from defined project tastes during reviews.

How do I generate diverse options for community voting based on different tastes?

Generate diverse voting options by curating choices that reflect different explicit tastes within a group. This process balances contributor preferences and surfaces alignment or divergence, enabling communities to vote on options matching defined taste dimensions.

Can I use this approach for both drafting and reviewing creative work?

Yes, taste evaluation applies to drafting, reviewing, and voting scenarios where explicit preferences must be surfaced and balanced. It diagnoses taste-level alignment and conflicts across these stages, exposing divergence and offering actionable recommendations.

When should I not use taste alignment checks for creative evaluation?

Avoid taste alignment checks when a project requires strict adherence to rigid standards rather than balancing subjective preferences. The approach is designed to spark productive creative friction by exposing alignment or divergence from explicit tastes, not enforcing absolute rules.