What problem does it solve? Single-pass generalist reviews of research papers miss domain-specific issues in methodology, statistics, empirical plausibility, and reproducibility. This Skill structures peer review as separate specialist passes so findings are located, ranked, and converted into an actionable fix queue without premature rewriting. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Multi-Persona Review: Run Methodology, Statistical, Empirical, Reproducibility, and Prose personas as separate passes, each with its own checklist and escalation path. - Severity-Ranked Findings: Every finding cites a specific passage, is ranked blocking/major/minor/style, and cross-referenced across personas to surface converging concerns. - Use Case: When reviewing a methods section of a topological data analysis paper, select the Methodology, Statistical, and Reproducibility personas, run each separately, and produce a fix queue with required evidence per item before any rewriting begins. ## Quick Start Review the methods section of my paper using the Methodology, Statistical, and Reproducibility personas as separate passes and produce a ranked fix queue.
