tdd

Automate RED-GREEN-REFACTOR test-driven development workflows with governance gates.

Updated Mar 14, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/edyruja/ProiectAIDiodele --skill tdd-edyruja
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: tdd
Source: https://github.com/edyruja/ProiectAIDiodele/tree/main/.agent/skills/tdd
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/edyruja/ProiectAIDiodele --skill tdd-edyruja

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

TDD enforces building software by writing tests first, ensuring every production change is motivated by a failing test and reducing defects across the codebase.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle to drive incremental development, ensuring changes are validated by tests at every stage.
  • TDD governance: commit messages, evidence of failing tests, and traceable test-driven progress in the history.
  • Quality and safety gates: coverage checks, PR requirements, and best-practice workflows to minimize regression risk.

Quick Start

Begin by writing a failing test, then implement just enough code to pass, and finally refactor.

Frequently Asked Questions about tdd

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate test-driven development workflows for incremental code changes?

Automating test-driven development workflows involves enforcing the RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle to guide incremental changes, ensuring every production code modification is driven by a failing test to maintain high test coverage.

What is the RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle and how does it enforce code quality?

The RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle is a strict test-driven development discipline where you write a failing test first, implement minimal production code to pass it, and then refactor, ensuring high test coverage and predictable delivery.

How do I enforce test coverage checks and failing test evidence in my commit history?

Test coverage checks and failing test evidence are enforced through test-driven development governance, which requires clear refactors and traceable test-driven progress in commit messages to minimize regression risk.

Can I apply strict test-driven development discipline to software projects of any size?

Yes, strict test-driven development discipline applies to software projects of any size, guiding developers through incremental changes and quality safety gates to reduce defects across the entire codebase.

What's the best way to start a testing-oriented workflow for test-driven development?

The best way to start a testing-oriented workflow is to begin by writing a failing test, implement just enough production code to pass it, and finally refactor to ensure changes are validated by tests at every stage.

Why does test-driven development require a testing-oriented workflow and governance?

Test-driven development requires a testing-oriented workflow and governance to enforce quality and predictable delivery by making tests drive production code, ensuring failing tests, minimal implementation, and clear refactors.