team-create-plan

To create an implementation plan for complex features, you can use a team-based planning workflow where an Architect, Risk Analyst, and Researcher collaborate to explore competing designs and challenge assumptions. This orchestrates parallel expert roles to synthesize a robust plan.

Adversarial review in architecture design is a process where a Risk Analyst actively challenges proposals to uncover risks and failure modes. You need it for high-stakes or ambiguous requirements where multiple valid approaches exist and adversarial review improves robustness.

You generate an ADR-backed plan by orchestrating an expert planning team to research, challenge, and validate proposals. This produces a structured plan with phase structure, exit conditions, risks, and dependencies for your high-stakes codebase changes.

Yes, team-based planning is specifically designed for high-stakes or ambiguous requirements where multiple valid approaches exist. The three specialist roles work in parallel to surface trade-offs and synthesize a coherent implementation plan.

The best way to analyze risks and dependencies is deploying a Risk Analyst role within an expert planning team to actively challenge proposals. This adversarial review uncovers failure modes and produces a structured plan with explicit risks and dependencies.

You should use a multi-role planning team because adversarial review improves robustness for complex features. While single-pass architecture design may miss failure modes, parallel specialist roles surface trade-offs and validate proposals through active challenge.