team-deliverables

Convert multi-agent research and debate outputs into standardized validation, PRD, and competitive deliverables.

1|Updated May 16, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/enigmaicon-eng/AI-Enterprise-OS --skill team-deliverables
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: team-deliverables
Source: https://github.com/enigmaicon-eng/AI-Enterprise-OS/tree/main/agents/plugins/agent-teams/skills/team-deliverables
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/enigmaicon-eng/AI-Enterprise-OS --skill team-deliverables

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

team-deliverables standardizes and accelerates the creation of final outputs from multi-agent team discussions by providing consistent templates and scoring rubrics for validation, PRD review, and competitive synthesis.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Validation Verdict templates & scoring rubrics: Produces a go/no-go style verdict with structured scoring for user problem, market opportunity, and defensibility (1-10), plus evidence, conflicts, and next steps.
  • PRD Review Report templates & scoring rubrics: Generates a PRD stress-test report with dimension scores (1-5) for market fit, feasibility, and scope, including blocking issues, revision checklist, and reviewer conflicts.
  • Competitive Synthesis templates & scoring structure: Outputs positioning maps, battle cards, differentiation opportunities, and recommendations aligned to competitive war-room workflows.

Quick Start

Use team-deliverables to produce a final competitive synthesis report by running the command /agent-teams:competitive-war-room after your agents complete competitor deep-dives.

Frequently Asked Questions about team-deliverables

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I standardize multi-agent debate outputs into structured deliverables?

Multi-agent debate outputs are standardized into structured deliverables by applying predefined scoring rubrics, evidence capture, and conflict resolution rules to produce validation verdicts, PRD stress tests, and competitive synthesis reports.

What is a validation verdict and how does its scoring rubric work?

A validation verdict is a go/no-go decision output that scores user problem, market opportunity, and defensibility from 1-10. It captures supporting evidence, notes team conflicts, and outlines actionable next steps for downstream decision-making.

How do I generate a PRD stress test report with dimension scoring?

PRD stress test reports are generated using dimension scores from 1-5 for market fit, feasibility, and scope. The template highlights blocking issues, provides a revision checklist, and records reviewer conflicts to ensure comprehensive coverage.

What's the best way to format competitive analysis battle cards and positioning maps?

Competitive analysis battle cards and positioning maps are formatted by synthesizing competitor deep-dives into structured templates. This yields differentiation opportunities, strategic recommendations, and scannable tables for competitive war-room workflows.

Does team-deliverables require specific inputs to start generating competitive synthesis reports?

Generating competitive synthesis reports requires completed multi-agent competitor deep-dives as input. Once agent research and debates are finished, the skill applies its templates to convert raw outputs into standardized final reports.

Can I use these deliverable templates for idea validation without manual formatting?

Yes, idea validation outputs are automatically formatted using predefined scoring dimensions and rules. The templates ensure scannable tables and consistent verdict formatting without requiring manual document structuring.