team-testing

Orchestrate progressive automated test coverage across L1, L2, and L3 layers.

1|Updated May 12, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/tcytan/tecton --skill team-testing-tcytan
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: team-testing
Source: https://github.com/tcytan/tecton/tree/main/.claude/skills/team-testing
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/tcytan/tecton --skill team-testing-tcytan

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill orchestrates a multi-agent testing pipeline that increases confidence by generating, executing, and iteratively improving tests across L1/L2/L3 coverage layers when quality gates are not met.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Progressive test coverage: Runs a strategist → generator → executor → analyst workflow, selecting a targeted/standard/comprehensive pipeline based on change scope.
  • Generator–Critic convergence: Uses Generator–Critic loops to revise and re-execute tests up to configured limits until pass rate and coverage targets are satisfied.
  • Sessionized, auditable outputs: Writes structured artifacts to a dedicated session directory, including strategy, test files, execution results, and a quality report.

Quick Start

Orchestrate multi-agent test generation and execution for the current change set by triggering the pipeline with the message "team testing" and providing your test task description.

Frequently Asked Questions about team-testing

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I progressively add test coverage for code changes across unit, integration, and E2E layers?

Progressive test coverage is orchestrated by mapping change scope into L1 unit, L2 integration, and L3 E2E layers, running a coordinator-selected pipeline that generates, executes, and iteratively improves tests until quality gates are met.

How does a Generator-Critic loop work for automated test generation?

Generator-Critic loops for automated test generation work by having a generator create tests, a critic revise them, and an executor re-run them up to configured max iterations until pass-rate and layer coverage targets are satisfied.

What is the best way to automate test generation and execution with quality gates?

Automating test generation with quality gates involves a strategist-to-analyst workflow that executes tests, analyzes results, and applies pass-rate and layer coverage targets to gate progression, writing structured artifacts to a session directory for auditability.

Do I need YAML-defined role routing to run multi-agent test orchestration?

Multi-agent test orchestration requires YAML-defined role routing to execute phase-by-phase tasks, routing work through the strategist, generator, executor, and analyst roles while managing shared session artifacts and convergence limits.

Can I target specific testing scenarios instead of running comprehensive test coverage?

Targeted testing scenarios are supported alongside standard and comprehensive pipelines, allowing the coordinator to select the appropriate testing depth based on the mapped change scope and proceed with the corresponding L1, L2, and L3 execution.

When should I not use multi-agent orchestration for test coverage?

Multi-agent orchestration for test coverage should be avoided when simple change sets require no iterative refinement, as the Generator-Critic convergence loops and sessionized artifacts add overhead unnecessary for basic, single-layer unit testing.