skills.rest
Aitronos-Development
Aitronos-DevelopmentOFFICIAL
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

tech-review

Compare implementation artifacts against a technical execution spec and output a pass/fail verdict.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
Search Tags:#feedback#compliance#quality-assurance#code-review#technical-spec#phase-review#sub-developer
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Aitronos-Development/aitronos-standards --skill tech-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: tech-review
Source: https://github.com/Aitronos-Development/aitronos-standards/tree/main/skills/tech-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Aitronos-Development/aitronos-standards --skill tech-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill provides a structured review workflow to verify sub-developer implementations against a technical execution spec, and to generate actionable feedback or mark a phase as complete.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured verdicts: produces a clear pass/fail assessment and a feedback message when failing.
  • Phased review workflow: guides reviewers through loading specs, comparing implementations, and producing a formal verdict.
  • Audit-ready outputs: aligns with project conventions for phase completion and documentation.

Quick Start

Run the /tech-review command and specify which phase or component to review, then provide the spec and implementation artifacts for automated evaluation.

Frequently Asked Questions about tech-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify if a sub-developer's implementation meets the technical execution spec?▼

Reviewing an implementation against a technical spec involves loading the phase specification, exploring the submitted artifacts, and comparing them to generate a structured pass/fail verdict with actionable feedback.

What is a structured phase review for software engineering compliance?▼

A phase review is a structured workflow that evaluates project implementations across models, services, routes, and documentation to verify compliance with the technical spec and generate a formal pass/fail verdict.

How do I perform a code review that outputs a formal pass or fail verdict?▼

To perform a code review with a formal verdict, run the review command, specify the phase or component to evaluate, and provide the spec and implementation artifacts to generate a pass/fail assessment with recommended fixes.

Can I use automated technical spec compliance checks for models and routes?▼

Yes, automated technical spec compliance checks are applicable to project-phase reviews across models, services, routes, and documentation to verify implementation compliance and provide actionable feedback.

What do I need to generate an audit-ready pass fail assessment for a project phase?▼

To generate an audit-ready pass/fail assessment, you need to load the technical execution spec and provide the sub-developer's implementation artifacts for the specific project phase being reviewed.

What happens when an implementation fails the technical spec review?▼

When an implementation fails the technical spec review, the process outputs a structured failing verdict along with a feedback message containing actionable recommended fixes to achieve spec compliance.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
EmpoweredHouseEmpoweredHouse

speckit-plan

Generate implementation plans and artifacts from a feature spec.

Official
Advanced
ksciuskscius
2

sdlc-checkpoint

Validate SDLC phase outputs and issue PASS, CONDITIONAL, or BLOCK verdicts.

Community
Advanced
juicesharpjuicesharp
581

blueprint

Decompose features into vertical slices and generate phased implementation plans.

Community
Advanced
SeventeenthEarthSeventeenthEarth

17th-task-inspector

Inspect implementation compliance against TASK.md and produce a PASS/FAIL verdict report.

Community
Advanced