skills.rest
krwhynot
krwhynotCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

technical-feedback

Enforce a six-step code-review feedback protocol with project-principle verification.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
Search Tags:#feedback#principles#verify#PR#code-review
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/krwhynot/crispy-crm --skill technical-feedback
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: technical-feedback
Source: https://github.com/krwhynot/crispy-crm/tree/main/.claude/skills/technical-feedback
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/krwhynot/crispy-crm --skill technical-feedback

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Establishes a bidirectional code-review protocol that emphasizes verification before implementation and pushes back on principle violations, ensuring high-quality, principled changes.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Receiving Feedback: Read, understand, verify against the codebase, evaluate against principles, respond, and implement item-by-item.
  • Giving Feedback: Prioritize project principles, provide specific, actionable guidance with exact fixes and paths forward.
  • Principle Violations: Automatic pushback for Fail-Fast, Single Data Provider, Zod-at-API-Boundary, and Design-System violations.

Quick Start

When reviewing a PR, respond with precise code-level changes or justification, following the pattern: identify issue, propose fix, and include a verification step.

Frequently Asked Questions about technical-feedback

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I structure code review feedback to be more actionable and consistent?▼

Structured feedback follows a six-step pattern: READ the code, UNDERSTAND the context, VERIFY against your codebase, EVALUATE against project principles, RESPOND with specific fixes, and IMPLEMENT item-by-item. This ensures consistency and reduces back-and-forth cycles in PR reviews.

What should I check for when reviewing pull requests against project principles?▼

Verify adherence to Fail-Fast, Single Data Provider, Zod-at-API-Boundary, Design System, and Deprecated Patterns principles. Automatic pushback on violations ensures high-quality changes aligned with your project's architecture and standards.

How do I give precise code-review feedback with exact fixes?▼

Identify the specific issue in the PR, propose an exact code-level change with file paths, and include a verification step to confirm the fix works. This replaces vague suggestions with actionable guidance developers can implement directly.

Can I use this feedback approach for AI tool suggestions and developer exchanges?▼

Yes, the bidirectional protocol works for feedback between developers, AI tools, and code review systems. It standardizes how suggestions are verified against the codebase and principles before implementation.

Why does principle-based pushback matter in code review?▼

Principle-based pushback prevents inconsistent implementations and technical debt by catching violations early. It enforces Single Data Provider, Zod validation at boundaries, and Design System compliance before code merges.

Should I implement feedback all at once or one item at a time?▼

Implement one item at a time after verification. This reduces complexity, makes testing straightforward, and simplifies rollback if issues arise during PR review cycles.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
nopperabbonopperabbo
7

mcp-builder

Design MCP servers with tool registration, input validation, and error handling.

Community
Advanced
davpatel605-beepdavpatel605-beep

requesting-code-review

Run security scans, quality checks, and independent review workflows before git commits.

Community
Advanced
thanh-abaiithanh-abaii
34

gs:health

Compute a weighted composite codebase health score from type checker, linter, and test runner results.

Community
Advanced
pingqLINpingqLIN

code-review-generic

Generate structured code review guidelines with customizable checklists.

Community
Intermediate