skills.rest
cankush625
cankush625COMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
Website𝕏@TheNameIsAnkushGitHub

temper-review

Review code diffs or pull requests using a multi-lane rubric.

2|Updated Jun 12, 2026
Search Tags:#diff analysis#quality assurance#code review#software verification#Pull Request review
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/cankush625/temper --skill temper-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: temper-review
Source: https://github.com/cankush625/temper/tree/main/skills/temper-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/cankush625/temper --skill temper-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill ensures a thorough, structured code review that verifies and validates changes with strict guidelines and records signed, tree-pinned verdicts.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Thorough Review Process: Applies a 10-lane review rubric encompassing structural integrity, correctness, security, and other key aspects.
  • Dedicated Evaluator Role: Emphasizes objective review, separating evaluators from authors for impartiality.
  • Verification & Proof: Leaves nothing uncovered and requires evidence to prove each part of the review.

Quick Start

Use the /tp-review slash command on your Claude Code to initiate a code review with the temper-review Skill.

Frequently Asked Questions about temper-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I conduct an in-depth code review on a pull request diff?▼

An in-depth code review on a pull request diff analyzes structural integrity and correctness against project conventions using a multi-lane rubric, ensuring every code change aligns with the specified intent.

What does a multi-lane rubric evaluate during a structural code review?▼

A multi-lane rubric for structural code review evaluates structural integrity, correctness, and security to verify and validate changes with strict guidelines, leaving nothing uncovered during the diff analysis.

How do I verify code changes align with project conventions during software verification?▼

Software verification confirms code changes align with project conventions by applying strict guidelines and requiring evidence to prove each part of the review, leaving nothing uncovered.

Can I use slash commands to initiate a pull request review in the Claude Code environment?▼

Yes, you can initiate a pull request review in the Claude Code environment by using the dedicated slash command to trigger the structured code review process.

Does a structured code review require separating evaluators from authors?▼

Yes, a structured code review emphasizes objective evaluation by separating evaluators from authors to ensure impartiality and record signed, tree-pinned verdicts for the diff analysis.

What are the limitations of automated diff analysis for quality assurance?▼

Automated diff analysis requires evidence to prove each part of the review and relies on a dedicated evaluator role, meaning it needs a properly configured Claude Code environment to function correctly.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
nillenille

Code Review

Review code diffs for correctness, security, and conventions.

Community
Advanced
taloncjonestaloncjones

ship

Automate code review, testing, version bump, merge, and post-merge cleanup for pull requests.

Community
Advanced
dljsjrdljsjr

code-review

Detect code quality issues in pull requests, diffs, and codebases.

Community
Advanced
loomantixloomantix
2

deepgrill

Orchestrate multi-lane adversarial code review for high-risk pull requests.

Official
Advanced