template-polish

To polish a rebuttal message, the text is rephrased to improve clarity and professionalism while preserving the original structure, intent, and placeholders without making substantive content changes.

Yes, you can improve the tone of an academic reviewer response by rephrasing the text for professionalism while keeping the original structure intact and maintaining the original intent throughout the editing process.

The best way to edit rebuttal messages with placeholders is to rephrase the surrounding text for readability while strictly preserving the placeholder markers and the document's structural integrity.

No, polishing a status update does not change the substantive content. It performs rephrasing solely for clarity and maintains the original tone without altering the message's core intent.

You need to preserve placeholders in a reviewer response when the text is part of an automated academic rebuttal workflow that relies on those markers for later data insertion or document generation.

The limitation is that only rephrasing for clarity occurs; it does not generate new substantive content, meaning the original argument structure and all placeholders must already be present in the input.