temporal

Timing analysis evaluates readiness, window, momentum, and cost of waiting to determine whether to act now, wait, or prepare under uncertainty. It outputs actionable implications guiding the optimal decision moment.

Horizon mapping translates a situation into short, medium, and long-term consequences to reveal trade-offs and lock-in risks. You need it when evaluating long-term strategy requires understanding impacts across multiple timeframes.

Cycle detection identifies the repeating pattern and your current phase within it to choose actions that fit. It applies temporal reasoning to timing decisions by diagnosing whether the core issue is cyclical.

Futures mapping explores possible, probable, and preferable futures to translate them into decisions today. It is the best way to handle decision timing when uncertainty is high and multiple future scenarios exist.

Yes, temporal reasoning routes product launch timing decisions into the correct framework by diagnosing whether the real issue is phase-in-a-cycle, horizon trade-offs, uncertain futures, or readiness and window timing.

You should not use cycle detection when your situation lacks repeating patterns, as temporal reasoning will route your decision to horizon mapping, futures mapping, or timing analysis instead based on the diagnosed need.