skills.rest
Bossmann007
Bossmann007COMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

tese-vinculante-checker

Check legal theses against STF and STJ binding precedents.

Updated Jun 30, 2026
Search Tags:#legal research#risk assessment#risk mitigation#jurisdiction#legal precedents
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Bossmann007/claude-legal-br --skill tese-vinculante-checker
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: tese-vinculante-checker
Source: https://github.com/Bossmann007/claude-legal-br/tree/main/litigation-legal/skills/tese-vinculante-checker
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Bossmann007/claude-legal-br --skill tese-vinculante-checker

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill ensures that a legal thesis is in alignment with existing binding and persuasive authority, mitigating risks of judicial rejection or suspension.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Authority Check: Analyze thesis against STF and STJ precedents, including sumulas, themes of general repercussion, and repetitive appeals.
  • Risk Assessment: Identify potential risks of judicial suspension due to conflicting precedents.
  • Research Protocol: Provide a structured approach to search for relevant legal authorities on JusBrasil and court websites.
  • Output: Generate a detailed report on the binding and persuasive authority found, along with risk assessment and recommendations.

Quick Start

Run the tese-vinculante-checker with your thesis description and select the appropriate jurisdiction. Example: /tese-vinculante-checker --theme "Infringement of copyright" --side plaintiff --tribunal STJ

Frequently Asked Questions about tese-vinculante-checker

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify a legal thesis against binding precedents before filing?▼

To verify a legal thesis against binding precedents before filing, you check it against STF and STJ authority to identify conflicts with existing decisions and mitigate risks of judicial suspension or rejection.

What is the risk of filing a legal thesis that conflicts with STF or STJ precedents?▼

The risk of filing a legal thesis that conflicts with STF or STJ precedents is judicial rejection or case suspension, making legal research for binding authority and general repercussion themes critical for risk mitigation.

How do I check if my case conflicts with pending cases of general repercussion?▼

You check if your case conflicts with pending cases of general repercussion by analyzing the thesis against STF and STJ precedents, including sumulas and repetitive appeals, to assess potential judicial suspension risks.

Does legal research for risk assessment include persuasive authority from JusBrasil?▼

Legal research for risk assessment includes persuasive authority from JusBrasil and court websites, providing a structured protocol to search relevant legal authorities alongside binding STF and STJ precedents.

What jurisdictions and tribunals are supported for legal thesis verification?▼

Legal thesis verification supports the Supreme Federal Tribunal (STF) and Superior Court of Justice (STJ) jurisdictions, analyzing precedents like sumulas, themes of general repercussion, and repetitive appeals.

Related Skills

Explore More Legal & Compliance Skills→
Bossmann007Bossmann007

research-start

Create legal research roadmaps with statutes, case law areas, and search terms.

Community
Intermediate
jamon8888jamon8888

contentieux-pi

Analyze IP litigation cases and generate strategic decision memos.

Community
Advanced
SigmacodeatSigmacodeat

precedent-finder

Find controlling precedents from legal corpora with court, case number, and relevance ranking.

Community
Advanced
jamon8888jamon8888

comparaison-bases

Compare document search results from multiple legal databases.

Community
Intermediate