test-at-positional-args

Test positional argument substitution mechanisms and log resolved values to an output file.

3|1|Updated Dec 2, 2024
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/faisalanjum/EventTrader --skill test-at-positional-args
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: test-at-positional-args
Source: https://github.com/faisalanjum/EventTrader/tree/main/.claude/skills/test-at-positional-args
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/faisalanjum/EventTrader --skill test-at-positional-args

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps developers test and verify how positional arguments are correctly substituted and accessed within a Skill's execution environment.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Argument Verification: Confirms that $ARGUMENTS, $ARGUMENTS[N], and $N shorthands correctly resolve to their intended values.
  • Debugging Tool: Aids in debugging argument passing mechanisms for Skills.
  • Use Case: When developing a new Skill that relies on user-provided arguments, use this Skill to ensure those arguments are received and processed as expected before integrating them into the main logic.

Quick Start

Run the test-at-positional-args skill with three arguments: apple, banana, cherry.

Frequently Asked Questions about test-at-positional-args

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I test positional argument substitution in a skill execution environment?

To test positional argument substitution, you can use a debugging skill that validates the resolution of full argument strings, indexed arguments, and shorthand notations like $ARGUMENTS, $ARGUMENTS[N], and $N. It logs substituted values to an output file for verification.

Why are my positional arguments not resolving correctly during skill development?

Positional arguments may fail to resolve due to incorrect shorthand syntax or indexing errors. You can debug this by running a verification test that checks $ARGUMENTS, $ARGUMENTS[N], and $N substitutions and logs the actual received values to a file.

What is the difference between $ARGUMENTS and $N shorthand notation for arguments?

The $ARGUMENTS notation resolves the full argument string provided, while $N and $ARGUMENTS[N] resolve to specific indexed positional arguments. Testing these substitutions ensures accurate argument passing within a skill's execution context.

How do I verify if my skill receives the correct user-provided arguments?

You verify user-provided arguments by passing test values like apple, banana, and cherry to a testing skill. It validates the argument passing mechanisms and logs the substituted values to a specified output file for inspection.

Can I use this argument testing skill without any external dependencies?

Yes, you can test argument substitution without external dependencies. This skill requires no components or dependencies to run, allowing you to validate argument resolution mechanisms directly within your current development environment.