test-case-generation

Generate structured JSON test cases from requirement documents with confidence scores.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/taptap/agents-plugins --skill test-case-generation-taptap
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: test-case-generation
Source: https://github.com/taptap/agents-plugins/tree/main/plugins/test/skills/test-case-generation
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/taptap/agents-plugins --skill test-case-generation-taptap

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Converting requirement documents, design links, or upstream clarification artifacts into structured, reviewable test cases is time-consuming and error-prone; this Skill automates module decomposition, case generation, and multi-agent review to ensure coverage and quality.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated decomposition of requirements into modules and generation of module_{N}_cases.json files.
  • Parallel test-case generation with confidence scoring, cross-agent redundancy review, and sufficiency gating.
  • Integrated review workflow that produces test_cases.json, tc_gen_review.md, review_summary.json, and final_cases.json suitable for downstream ingestion.
  • Use case: QA teams supply a requirement document or story link and receive a finalized, reviewed JSON test suite with coverage gaps addressed.

Quick Start

Generate structured test cases from a requirement document and output final_cases.json along with a review_summary.json.

Frequently Asked Questions about test-case-generation

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I generate structured test cases from requirement documents?

You can automate test case generation by feeding requirement files or story links into the workflow. It decomposes requirements into modules, generates JSON test cases with confidence and review scores, cross-checks for redundancy, and enforces sufficiency gating before emitting final_cases.json.

What is the best way to automate QA test case decomposition and coverage review?

Automating test case decomposition involves breaking requirements into modules and generating JSON cases in parallel. A multi-agent review workflow then checks for redundancy, scores confidence, addresses coverage gaps, and emits a review_summary.json for quality assurance.

Can I use requirement clarification artifacts to produce module-level JSON test cases?

Requirement clarification artifacts serve as valid inputs for generating module-level JSON test cases. The workflow processes these artifacts to create module_{N}_cases.json files, runs redundancy-pair reviews, and aggregates them into final_cases.json for downstream ingestion.

How does confidence scoring work in automated test case generation?

Confidence scoring evaluates generated test cases during creation and multi-agent review. Each case receives confidence and review_confidence scores, which feed into sufficiency gating and redundancy-pair reviews to ensure the final_cases.json output meets coverage and quality thresholds.

Does automated test case generation support downstream ingestion formats?

Automated test case generation outputs structured JSON files like final_cases.json and test_cases.json, along with tc_gen_review.md and review_summary.json. These formats are designed for seamless downstream ingestion into test automation frameworks and coverage tracking systems.