test-driven-development

Enforces a RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle requiring a failing test before production code.

Updated Mar 26, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/cloudliness/Hermes-Autonomous-AI-Agent-Dialed-In-For-Windows-11 --skill test-driven-development-cloudliness
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: test-driven-development
Source: https://github.com/cloudliness/Hermes-Autonomous-AI-Agent-Dialed-In-For-Windows-11/tree/main/skills/software-development/test-driven-development
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/cloudliness/Hermes-Autonomous-AI-Agent-Dialed-In-For-Windows-11 --skill test-driven-development-cloudliness

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Implementing features or fixes often leads to code written before tests, causing undetected regressions. This skill enforces a disciplined RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle to ensure tests exist and drive development.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Enforces failing tests before implementation to validate requirements.
  • Guides teams through a repeatable workflow: write test, run, implement, run, refactor.
  • Improves maintainability and confidence during bug fixes and feature upgrades.

Quick Start

Write a failing test for a new feature, then implement just enough code to pass it.

Frequently Asked Questions about test-driven-development

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I enforce a test-driven development workflow in my software project?

To enforce test-driven development, you must require a failing test before any production code is written. This skill guides teams through a deterministic RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle, ensuring tests drive feature development and bug fixes to prevent undetected regressions.

What is the RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle and how does it improve software quality?

The RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle is a test-first workflow where you write a failing test, implement just enough code to pass it, and then refactor. This repeatable process improves software maintainability, ensures requirements are validated, and builds confidence during upgrades.

Do I need a specific test framework to start writing failing tests before implementation?

You need a test framework like pytest and a project structure that supports tests. The workflow requires tooling to run tests and report failures, ensuring early feedback and establishing quality gates before you implement production code for features or bug fixes.

How do I apply test-first development for fixing bugs and adding new features?

Apply test-first development by writing a failing test that validates the specific bug or new feature requirement. Once the test fails, implement the minimum production code required to pass it, run the tests again, and refactor to maintain software quality.

When should I not use a test-first workflow for software development?

You should not use a test-first workflow if your project lacks a supporting test framework or project structure for running tests. Without tooling to report test failures and provide early feedback, the deterministic RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle cannot be effectively enforced.

What's the best way to prevent undetected regressions when implementing features?

The best way to prevent undetected regressions is enforcing a test-first workflow. By requiring a failing test before implementation and following the RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle, you ensure early feedback and validate requirements before production code is merged.