test-driven-development

Guide writing failing tests before implementing code using the red-green-refactor cycle.

3|Updated Feb 2, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Dethon/ai-dev-flow --skill test-driven-development-dethon
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: test-driven-development
Source: https://github.com/Dethon/ai-dev-flow/tree/main/skills/test-driven-development
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Dethon/ai-dev-flow --skill test-driven-development-dethon

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Teams often deliver features without sufficient automated tests, leading to fragile code and regressions. This skill advocates a tests-first approach, guiding you to write tests before implementation to lock in intended behavior.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Red-Green-Refactor workflow: write a failing test, verify it fails, implement just enough code to pass, then refactor while keeping tests green.
  • Broad applicability: use for new features, bug fixes, and refactors to ensure stability.
  • Documentation of intent: tests encode expected behavior driving future changes and facilitating maintenance.

Quick Start

Initiate a test-first cycle by creating a failing test for a small feature, then implement only enough production code to pass the test and refactor.

Frequently Asked Questions about test-driven-development

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is the test-driven development workflow for writing new features?

The test-driven development workflow follows the red-green-refactor cycle: write a failing test, implement minimal code to pass it, then refactor while keeping tests green to ensure correct behavior.

How do I start using a tests-first approach for bug fixes and refactoring?

Start using a tests-first approach by writing a failing test that reproduces the bug or verifies the intended refactor behavior, then implement just enough production code to make the test pass.

When should I use test-driven development instead of writing tests after implementation?

Use test-driven development when delivering features, fixing bugs, or refactoring to lock in intended behavior upfront, preventing fragile code and regressions caused by insufficient automated tests.

How does writing failing tests before implementation improve code maintainability?

Writing failing tests before implementation improves maintainability by encoding expected behavior as documentation, which drives future changes and ensures stability throughout the red-green-refactor cycle.

Can I apply the red-green-refactor cycle to existing codebases during refactoring?

Yes, you can apply the red-green-refactor cycle to existing codebases during refactoring to verify stability and ensure the refactored code maintains correct behavior through minimal passing tests.

What are the limitations of enforcing test-driven development for software engineering?

Enforcing test-driven development requires crafting minimal tests and following strict red-green-refactor discipline, which may slow initial feature delivery but prevents regressions and ensures long-term maintainability.