test-driven-development

Enforce a strict test-driven development workflow by requiring a failing test to exist before any production code is written. This ensures code quality and prevents untested changes across feature development, bug fixes, and refactors.

The red-green-refactor cycle is a test-driven development discipline where you write a failing test, write the minimum code to pass it, then refactor. It improves software quality by aligning development with risk-control goals.

Apply test-driven development to bug fixes and refactors by first writing a failing test that reproduces the bug or validates the refactor target. This guarantees production code only exists after a failing test, ensuring maintainability.

Yes, test-driven development guidelines can be used for code review and QA governance. They provide explicit rules for test quality and coverage, aligning development practice with governance and risk-control goals to improve reliability.

Test-driven development might not be suitable when a software project requires rapid prototyping without strict quality constraints. It enforces red-green-refactor discipline and requires failing tests first, which can slow down initial exploratory coding.

Yes, requiring a failing test before implementing production code is the core rule of test-driven development. This practice ensures that all production code is validated and prevents changes that bypass the testing workflow.